Discussion:
runtime error '429' activex component can't create object
(too old to reply)
Bill
2008-03-10 09:02:29 UTC
Permalink
We recently moved to "visual studio 2008" . Our addin workd find on our
development machine which has Excel 2003 and Excel 2007. When we create the
installation package and install onto a machine with only Excel 2003 we get
the "runtime error '429' activex component can't create object". Any ideas
please.


Thanks in advance
Bob O`Bob
2008-03-10 10:31:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill
We recently moved to "visual studio 2008" .
(My condolences)


You won't want anything to do with the plain "vb" newsgroups
lacking "dotnet" or "vsnet" in their names, then,
because we don't use that ... stuff.



Bob
Classic VB MVP
--
Mike Williams
2008-03-10 10:34:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill
We recently moved to "visual studio 2008"
Please do not post questions relating to Visual Studio 2008 to this
newsgroup (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion). This group is for users
of Visual Basic. Although Visual Studio 2008 does actually include something
with the words "Basic" and "Visual" in its title, it is not the real Visual
Basic. In fact it is a completely different language, an imposter that has
been deliberately misdescribed in a dishonest attempt to fool people. Real
Visual Basic code, such as would be provided in answers on this newsgroup,
does not work in the imposter. You need to post your question to the
imposter's newsgroup (I believe they all end in net or something).

Mike
Tyro
2008-03-10 20:39:58 UTC
Permalink
Office's Visual Basic for Applications is a subset, syntactically, of Visual
Basic and its successor Visual Basic .NET and is designed to work with
Office applications' objects and properties.

Tyro
Post by Mike Williams
Post by Bill
We recently moved to "visual studio 2008"
Please do not post questions relating to Visual Studio 2008 to this
newsgroup (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion). This group is for
users of Visual Basic. Although Visual Studio 2008 does actually include
something with the words "Basic" and "Visual" in its title, it is not the
real Visual Basic. In fact it is a completely different language, an
imposter that has been deliberately misdescribed in a dishonest attempt to
fool people. Real Visual Basic code, such as would be provided in answers
on this newsgroup, does not work in the imposter. You need to post your
question to the imposter's newsgroup (I believe they all end in net or
something).
Mike
Bob Butler
2008-03-10 21:09:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tyro
Office's Visual Basic for Applications is a subset, syntactically, of
Visual Basic
OK...
Post by Tyro
and its successor Visual Basic .NET
ROTFLMAO
Ralph
2008-03-10 21:18:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Butler
Post by Tyro
Office's Visual Basic for Applications is a subset, syntactically, of
Visual Basic
OK...
Post by Tyro
and its successor Visual Basic .NET
ROTFLMAO
One learns the most amazing things from this newsgroup.

I can't wait to find out where VSTO fits into all this.

-ralph
<g>
Mike Williams
2008-03-10 22:01:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tyro
Office's Visual Basic for Applications is a subset,
syntactically, of Visual Basic
Actually is at once both a subset and a superset, but all of its "subset" is
understandable to VB6 programmers.
Post by Tyro
and its successor Visual Basic .NET and is . . .
VB.Net is NOT the successor to Visual Basic (VB6). VB.Net is a different
language. Microsoft developed a new and different language and they then
sprinkled lots of "VB sounding" constructs on top of it in a dishonest
attempt to fool people into thinking it is merely an "update" to VB6, when
in fact it is nothing of the sort. The new version of Delphi is just as much
a successor to VB6 as VB.Net is!

You've obviously been fooled, but we haven't. None of this says anything
about the actual merits of VB.Net of course. In many ways it may be better
than VB6 and in many ways it may be worse. It is just "different". If
Micro$oft had not lied to me then I might have actually bought it myself to
try it out. But I do not trust Micro$oft, because they lied to me, and so
they shall not be getting another penny of my hard earned money. And neither
shall I accept a free copy of VB.Net from simply because they have now
realised how difficult it is to sell!

Mike



Mike
Tyro
2008-03-10 22:41:18 UTC
Permalink
There is no VB 7. Learn to live with it. VB .Net is the successor.

Tyro
Post by Mike Williams
Post by Tyro
Office's Visual Basic for Applications is a subset,
syntactically, of Visual Basic
Actually is at once both a subset and a superset, but all of its "subset"
is understandable to VB6 programmers.
Post by Tyro
and its successor Visual Basic .NET and is . . .
VB.Net is NOT the successor to Visual Basic (VB6). VB.Net is a different
language. Microsoft developed a new and different language and they then
sprinkled lots of "VB sounding" constructs on top of it in a dishonest
attempt to fool people into thinking it is merely an "update" to VB6, when
in fact it is nothing of the sort. The new version of Delphi is just as
much a successor to VB6 as VB.Net is!
You've obviously been fooled, but we haven't. None of this says anything
about the actual merits of VB.Net of course. In many ways it may be better
than VB6 and in many ways it may be worse. It is just "different". If
Micro$oft had not lied to me then I might have actually bought it myself
to try it out. But I do not trust Micro$oft, because they lied to me, and
so they shall not be getting another penny of my hard earned money. And
neither shall I accept a free copy of VB.Net from simply because they have
now realised how difficult it is to sell!
Mike
Mike
Bob Butler
2008-03-10 22:57:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tyro
There is no VB 7. Learn to live with it. VB .Net is the successor.
"successor" is not the same as "comes after"
Tyro
2008-03-10 23:07:40 UTC
Permalink
Talk to Microsoft about that. I see no VB7 on the horizon. If Microsoft
continues in the future with the .NET languages only, would you not
categorize Visual Basic .NET as the successor to Visual Basic 6?

Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
Post by Tyro
There is no VB 7. Learn to live with it. VB .Net is the successor.
"successor" is not the same as "comes after"
Bob Butler
2008-03-10 23:16:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tyro
Talk to Microsoft about that. I see no VB7 on the horizon.
Neither do I. I'm hopeful that some vendor will eventually produce
something that fills the hole left by MS abandoning VB.
Post by Tyro
If Microsoft continues in the future with the .NET languages only, would
you not categorize Visual Basic .NET as the successor to Visual Basic 6?
No more than C# or any other dotnet language could be called that.
Successor implies continuity and there is none.
Tyro
2008-03-11 00:05:02 UTC
Permalink
Ah well, this is the way it is.

Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
Post by Tyro
Talk to Microsoft about that. I see no VB7 on the horizon.
Neither do I. I'm hopeful that some vendor will eventually produce
something that fills the hole left by MS abandoning VB.
Post by Tyro
If Microsoft continues in the future with the .NET languages only, would
you not categorize Visual Basic .NET as the successor to Visual Basic 6?
No more than C# or any other dotnet language could be called that.
Successor implies continuity and there is none.
Mike Williams
2008-03-11 13:51:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tyro
Ah well, this is the way it is.
That's a totally meaningless statement! What do you mean by "this". Exactly
what is "the way it is"? Talk sense man! Speak English!

Mike
Jhessa Reid
2010-10-31 21:23:19 UTC
Permalink
Hi there,

Regarding about this [B][URL=http://www.speedypc.net/articles/runtime_error429.aspx]Runtime Error 429[/URL][/B], it often occurs when your computer is housing damaged or fragmented files. These often occur if your computer has a virus or if you failed to install or uninstall a program or application properly. Regardless of the cause, computer errors can be incredibly frustrating. They slow you down and can cause your computer to crash and lose valuable information. If you encounter runtime errors you should probably clean your Windows Database, which stores a vast amount of data about your hardware, software, user profiles and settings.

GODSPEED..:)
Post by Bill
We recently moved to "visual studio 2008" . Our addin workd find on our
development machine which has Excel 2003 and Excel 2007. When we create the
installation package and install onto a machine with only Excel 2003 we get
the "runtime error '429' activex component can't create object". Any ideas
please.
Thanks in advance
Post by Bob O`Bob
(My condolences)
You won't want anything to do with the plain "vb" newsgroups
lacking "dotnet" or "vsnet" in their names, then,
because we don't use that ... stuff.
Bob
Classic VB MVP
--
Post by Mike Williams
Please do not post questions relating to Visual Studio 2008 to this
newsgroup (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion). This group is for users
of Visual Basic. Although Visual Studio 2008 does actually include something
with the words "Basic" and "Visual" in its title, it is not the real Visual
Basic. In fact it is a completely different language, an imposter that has
been deliberately misdescribed in a dishonest attempt to fool people. Real
Visual Basic code, such as would be provided in answers on this newsgroup,
does not work in the imposter. You need to post your question to the
imposter's newsgroup (I believe they all end in net or something).
Mike
Post by Tyro
Office's Visual Basic for Applications is a subset, syntactically, of Visual
Basic and its successor Visual Basic .NET and is designed to work with
Office applications' objects and properties.
Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
OK...
ROTFLMAO
Post by Ralph
One learns the most amazing things from this newsgroup.
I cannot wait to find out where VSTO fits into all this.
-ralph
<g>
Post by Mike Williams
Actually is at once both a subset and a superset, but all of its "subset" is
understandable to VB6 programmers.
VB.Net is NOT the successor to Visual Basic (VB6). VB.Net is a different
language. Microsoft developed a new and different language and they then
sprinkled lots of "VB sounding" constructs on top of it in a dishonest
attempt to fool people into thinking it is merely an "update" to VB6, when
in fact it is nothing of the sort. The new version of Delphi is just as much
a successor to VB6 as VB.Net is!
You've obviously been fooled, but we haven't. None of this says anything
about the actual merits of VB.Net of course. In many ways it may be better
than VB6 and in many ways it may be worse. It is just "different". If
Micro$oft had not lied to me then I might have actually bought it myself to
try it out. But I do not trust Micro$oft, because they lied to me, and so
they shall not be getting another penny of my hard earned money. And neither
shall I accept a free copy of VB.Net from simply because they have now
realised how difficult it is to sell!
Mike
Mike
Post by Tyro
There is no VB 7. Learn to live with it. VB .Net is the successor.
Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
"successor" is not the same as "comes after"
Post by Tyro
Talk to Microsoft about that. I see no VB7 on the horizon. If Microsoft
continues in the future with the .NET languages only, would you not
categorize Visual Basic .NET as the successor to Visual Basic 6?
Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
Neither do I. I'm hopeful that some vendor will eventually produce
something that fills the hole left by MS abandoning VB.
No more than C# or any other dotnet language could be called that.
Successor implies continuity and there is none.
Post by Tyro
Ah well, this is the way it is.
Tyro
Post by Mike Williams
I already KNOW there is no VB7. And yes, I have already learned to live with
it.
No it's not. VB.Net is a new and completely different language. It is NOT
the successor to anything. If I want to choose a successor to VB6 then I
will chose it myself from one of the many different RAD tools that are
available. It may be VB.Net, but it is far more likely not to be because I
do not trust Micro$oft, so I will probably choose a RAD tool produced by
someone else.
Mike
Post by Mike Williams
No. Certainly not. Why should I? It is NOT the successor to VB6. It is a
different product that just happens to be made by the same manufacturer. If
H.J. Heinz stop making baked beans in tomato sauce (a great favourite over
here in the UK) and if they instead produce fried beans in pig's liver and
onion gravy I definitely would NOT see the fried beans as being the
successor to the baked beans, no matter what H.J. Heinz tried to tell me,
and I would not buy them! I would go somewhere else and I would buy my baked
beans from them instead! And if nobody else produced anything similar to the
baked beans in tomato sauce that I was used to then I would look at all the
available alternatives from all manufacturers and I would choose something
that I liked, and it would almost certainly not be the fried beans in pig's
liver and onion gravy! Sheesh! How can you be so totally taken in by
Micro$haft! Have you no mind of your own?
Mike
Post by Mike Williams
That's a totally meaningless statement! What do you mean by "this". Exactly
what is "the way it is"? Talk sense man! Speak English!
Mike
Submitted via EggHeadCafe - Software Developer Portal of Choice
FireAndForget Asynchronous Utility Class for SQL Server Inserts and Updates
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/tutorials/aspnet/7a22d9a4-59fc-40b0-8337-75c76f14fb3b/fireandforget-asynchronous-utility-class-for-sql-server-inserts-and-updates.aspx
Jhessa Reid
2010-10-31 21:24:50 UTC
Permalink
Hi there,

Regarding about this <a href="http://www.speedypc.net">Speed Up Computer</a>
, it often occurs when your computer is housing damaged or fragmented files. These often occur if your computer has a virus or if you failed to install or uninstall a program or application properly. Regardless of the cause, computer errors can be incredibly frustrating. They slow you down and can cause your computer to crash and lose valuable information. If you encounter runtime errors you should probably clean your Windows Database, which stores a vast amount of data about your hardware, software, user profiles and settings.

GODSPEED..:)
Post by Bill
We recently moved to "visual studio 2008" . Our addin workd find on our
development machine which has Excel 2003 and Excel 2007. When we create the
installation package and install onto a machine with only Excel 2003 we get
the "runtime error '429' activex component can't create object". Any ideas
please.
Thanks in advance
Post by Bob O`Bob
(My condolences)
You won't want anything to do with the plain "vb" newsgroups
lacking "dotnet" or "vsnet" in their names, then,
because we don't use that ... stuff.
Bob
Classic VB MVP
--
Post by Mike Williams
Please do not post questions relating to Visual Studio 2008 to this
newsgroup (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion). This group is for users
of Visual Basic. Although Visual Studio 2008 does actually include something
with the words "Basic" and "Visual" in its title, it is not the real Visual
Basic. In fact it is a completely different language, an imposter that has
been deliberately misdescribed in a dishonest attempt to fool people. Real
Visual Basic code, such as would be provided in answers on this newsgroup,
does not work in the imposter. You need to post your question to the
imposter's newsgroup (I believe they all end in net or something).
Mike
Post by Tyro
Office's Visual Basic for Applications is a subset, syntactically, of Visual
Basic and its successor Visual Basic .NET and is designed to work with
Office applications' objects and properties.
Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
OK...
ROTFLMAO
Post by Ralph
One learns the most amazing things from this newsgroup.
I cannot wait to find out where VSTO fits into all this.
-ralph
<g>
Post by Mike Williams
Actually is at once both a subset and a superset, but all of its "subset" is
understandable to VB6 programmers.
VB.Net is NOT the successor to Visual Basic (VB6). VB.Net is a different
language. Microsoft developed a new and different language and they then
sprinkled lots of "VB sounding" constructs on top of it in a dishonest
attempt to fool people into thinking it is merely an "update" to VB6, when
in fact it is nothing of the sort. The new version of Delphi is just as much
a successor to VB6 as VB.Net is!
You've obviously been fooled, but we haven't. None of this says anything
about the actual merits of VB.Net of course. In many ways it may be better
than VB6 and in many ways it may be worse. It is just "different". If
Micro$oft had not lied to me then I might have actually bought it myself to
try it out. But I do not trust Micro$oft, because they lied to me, and so
they shall not be getting another penny of my hard earned money. And neither
shall I accept a free copy of VB.Net from simply because they have now
realised how difficult it is to sell!
Mike
Mike
Post by Tyro
There is no VB 7. Learn to live with it. VB .Net is the successor.
Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
"successor" is not the same as "comes after"
Post by Tyro
Talk to Microsoft about that. I see no VB7 on the horizon. If Microsoft
continues in the future with the .NET languages only, would you not
categorize Visual Basic .NET as the successor to Visual Basic 6?
Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
Neither do I. I'm hopeful that some vendor will eventually produce
something that fills the hole left by MS abandoning VB.
No more than C# or any other dotnet language could be called that.
Successor implies continuity and there is none.
Post by Tyro
Ah well, this is the way it is.
Tyro
Post by Mike Williams
I already KNOW there is no VB7. And yes, I have already learned to live with
it.
No it's not. VB.Net is a new and completely different language. It is NOT
the successor to anything. If I want to choose a successor to VB6 then I
will chose it myself from one of the many different RAD tools that are
available. It may be VB.Net, but it is far more likely not to be because I
do not trust Micro$oft, so I will probably choose a RAD tool produced by
someone else.
Mike
Post by Mike Williams
No. Certainly not. Why should I? It is NOT the successor to VB6. It is a
different product that just happens to be made by the same manufacturer. If
H.J. Heinz stop making baked beans in tomato sauce (a great favourite over
here in the UK) and if they instead produce fried beans in pig's liver and
onion gravy I definitely would NOT see the fried beans as being the
successor to the baked beans, no matter what H.J. Heinz tried to tell me,
and I would not buy them! I would go somewhere else and I would buy my baked
beans from them instead! And if nobody else produced anything similar to the
baked beans in tomato sauce that I was used to then I would look at all the
available alternatives from all manufacturers and I would choose something
that I liked, and it would almost certainly not be the fried beans in pig's
liver and onion gravy! Sheesh! How can you be so totally taken in by
Micro$haft! Have you no mind of your own?
Mike
Post by Mike Williams
That's a totally meaningless statement! What do you mean by "this". Exactly
what is "the way it is"? Talk sense man! Speak English!
Mike
Post by Jhessa Reid
Hi there,
Regarding about this [B][URL=http://www.speedypc.net/articles/runtime_error429.aspx]Runtime Error 429[/URL][/B], it often occurs when your computer is housing damaged or fragmented files. These often occur if your computer has a virus or if you failed to install or uninstall a program or application properly. Regardless of the cause, computer errors can be incredibly frustrating. They slow you down and can cause your computer to crash and lose valuable information. If you encounter runtime errors you should probably clean your Windows Database, which stores a vast amount of data about your hardware, software, user profiles and settings.
GODSPEED..:)
Submitted via EggHeadCafe - Software Developer Portal of Choice
FireAndForget Asynchronous Utility Class for SQL Server Inserts and Updates
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/tutorials/aspnet/7a22d9a4-59fc-40b0-8337-75c76f14fb3b/fireandforget-asynchronous-utility-class-for-sql-server-inserts-and-updates.aspx
Jhessa Reid
2010-10-31 21:26:42 UTC
Permalink
Hi there,

Regarding about this Runtime Error 429, it often occurs when your computer is housing damaged or fragmented files. These often occur if your computer has a virus or if you failed to install or uninstall a program or application properly. Regardless of the cause, computer errors can be incredibly frustrating. They slow you down and can cause your computer to crash and lose valuable information. If you encounter runtime errors you should probably clean your Windows Database, which stores a vast amount of data about your hardware, software, user profiles and settings.

Just free to visit this site:

http://www.speedypc.net/articles/runtime_error429.aspx

GODSPEED..:)
Post by Bill
We recently moved to "visual studio 2008" . Our addin workd find on our
development machine which has Excel 2003 and Excel 2007. When we create the
installation package and install onto a machine with only Excel 2003 we get
the "runtime error '429' activex component can't create object". Any ideas
please.
Thanks in advance
Post by Bob O`Bob
(My condolences)
You won't want anything to do with the plain "vb" newsgroups
lacking "dotnet" or "vsnet" in their names, then,
because we don't use that ... stuff.
Bob
Classic VB MVP
--
Post by Mike Williams
Please do not post questions relating to Visual Studio 2008 to this
newsgroup (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion). This group is for users
of Visual Basic. Although Visual Studio 2008 does actually include something
with the words "Basic" and "Visual" in its title, it is not the real Visual
Basic. In fact it is a completely different language, an imposter that has
been deliberately misdescribed in a dishonest attempt to fool people. Real
Visual Basic code, such as would be provided in answers on this newsgroup,
does not work in the imposter. You need to post your question to the
imposter's newsgroup (I believe they all end in net or something).
Mike
Post by Tyro
Office's Visual Basic for Applications is a subset, syntactically, of Visual
Basic and its successor Visual Basic .NET and is designed to work with
Office applications' objects and properties.
Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
OK...
ROTFLMAO
Post by Ralph
One learns the most amazing things from this newsgroup.
I cannot wait to find out where VSTO fits into all this.
-ralph
<g>
Post by Mike Williams
Actually is at once both a subset and a superset, but all of its "subset" is
understandable to VB6 programmers.
VB.Net is NOT the successor to Visual Basic (VB6). VB.Net is a different
language. Microsoft developed a new and different language and they then
sprinkled lots of "VB sounding" constructs on top of it in a dishonest
attempt to fool people into thinking it is merely an "update" to VB6, when
in fact it is nothing of the sort. The new version of Delphi is just as much
a successor to VB6 as VB.Net is!
You've obviously been fooled, but we haven't. None of this says anything
about the actual merits of VB.Net of course. In many ways it may be better
than VB6 and in many ways it may be worse. It is just "different". If
Micro$oft had not lied to me then I might have actually bought it myself to
try it out. But I do not trust Micro$oft, because they lied to me, and so
they shall not be getting another penny of my hard earned money. And neither
shall I accept a free copy of VB.Net from simply because they have now
realised how difficult it is to sell!
Mike
Mike
Post by Tyro
There is no VB 7. Learn to live with it. VB .Net is the successor.
Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
"successor" is not the same as "comes after"
Post by Tyro
Talk to Microsoft about that. I see no VB7 on the horizon. If Microsoft
continues in the future with the .NET languages only, would you not
categorize Visual Basic .NET as the successor to Visual Basic 6?
Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
Neither do I. I'm hopeful that some vendor will eventually produce
something that fills the hole left by MS abandoning VB.
No more than C# or any other dotnet language could be called that.
Successor implies continuity and there is none.
Post by Tyro
Ah well, this is the way it is.
Tyro
Post by Mike Williams
I already KNOW there is no VB7. And yes, I have already learned to live with
it.
No it's not. VB.Net is a new and completely different language. It is NOT
the successor to anything. If I want to choose a successor to VB6 then I
will chose it myself from one of the many different RAD tools that are
available. It may be VB.Net, but it is far more likely not to be because I
do not trust Micro$oft, so I will probably choose a RAD tool produced by
someone else.
Mike
Post by Mike Williams
No. Certainly not. Why should I? It is NOT the successor to VB6. It is a
different product that just happens to be made by the same manufacturer. If
H.J. Heinz stop making baked beans in tomato sauce (a great favourite over
here in the UK) and if they instead produce fried beans in pig's liver and
onion gravy I definitely would NOT see the fried beans as being the
successor to the baked beans, no matter what H.J. Heinz tried to tell me,
and I would not buy them! I would go somewhere else and I would buy my baked
beans from them instead! And if nobody else produced anything similar to the
baked beans in tomato sauce that I was used to then I would look at all the
available alternatives from all manufacturers and I would choose something
that I liked, and it would almost certainly not be the fried beans in pig's
liver and onion gravy! Sheesh! How can you be so totally taken in by
Micro$haft! Have you no mind of your own?
Mike
Post by Mike Williams
That's a totally meaningless statement! What do you mean by "this". Exactly
what is "the way it is"? Talk sense man! Speak English!
Mike
Post by Jhessa Reid
Hi there,
Regarding about this [B][URL=http://www.speedypc.net/articles/runtime_error429.aspx]Runtime Error 429[/URL][/B], it often occurs when your computer is housing damaged or fragmented files. These often occur if your computer has a virus or if you failed to install or uninstall a program or application properly. Regardless of the cause, computer errors can be incredibly frustrating. They slow you down and can cause your computer to crash and lose valuable information. If you encounter runtime errors you should probably clean your Windows Database, which stores a vast amount of data about your hardware, software, user profiles and settings.
GODSPEED..:)
Post by Jhessa Reid
Hi there,
Regarding about this <a href="http://www.speedypc.net">Speed Up Computer</a>
, it often occurs when your computer is housing damaged or fragmented files. These often occur if your computer has a virus or if you failed to install or uninstall a program or application properly. Regardless of the cause, computer errors can be incredibly frustrating. They slow you down and can cause your computer to crash and lose valuable information. If you encounter runtime errors you should probably clean your Windows Database, which stores a vast amount of data about your hardware, software, user profiles and settings.
GODSPEED..:)
Submitted via EggHeadCafe - Software Developer Portal of Choice
SharePoint Workflow Custom Input Forms
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/tutorials/aspnet/2a494ffa-c3b0-41e5-9847-80e7cdf3779a/sharepoint-workflow-custom-input-forms.aspx
Jhessa Reid
2010-10-31 21:27:25 UTC
Permalink
Hi there,

Regarding about this Runtime Error 429, it often occurs when your computer is housing damaged or fragmented files. These often occur if your computer has a virus or if you failed to install or uninstall a program or application properly. Regardless of the cause, computer errors can be incredibly frustrating. They slow you down and can cause your computer to crash and lose valuable information. If you encounter runtime errors you should probably clean your Windows Database, which stores a vast amount of data about your hardware, software, user profiles and settings.

Just free to visit this site:

http://www.speedypc.net/articles/runtime_error429.aspx

GODSPEED..:)
Post by Bill
We recently moved to "visual studio 2008" . Our addin workd find on our
development machine which has Excel 2003 and Excel 2007. When we create the
installation package and install onto a machine with only Excel 2003 we get
the "runtime error '429' activex component can't create object". Any ideas
please.
Thanks in advance
Post by Bob O`Bob
(My condolences)
You won't want anything to do with the plain "vb" newsgroups
lacking "dotnet" or "vsnet" in their names, then,
because we don't use that ... stuff.
Bob
Classic VB MVP
--
Post by Mike Williams
Please do not post questions relating to Visual Studio 2008 to this
newsgroup (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion). This group is for users
of Visual Basic. Although Visual Studio 2008 does actually include something
with the words "Basic" and "Visual" in its title, it is not the real Visual
Basic. In fact it is a completely different language, an imposter that has
been deliberately misdescribed in a dishonest attempt to fool people. Real
Visual Basic code, such as would be provided in answers on this newsgroup,
does not work in the imposter. You need to post your question to the
imposter's newsgroup (I believe they all end in net or something).
Mike
Post by Tyro
Office's Visual Basic for Applications is a subset, syntactically, of Visual
Basic and its successor Visual Basic .NET and is designed to work with
Office applications' objects and properties.
Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
OK...
ROTFLMAO
Post by Ralph
One learns the most amazing things from this newsgroup.
I cannot wait to find out where VSTO fits into all this.
-ralph
<g>
Post by Mike Williams
Actually is at once both a subset and a superset, but all of its "subset" is
understandable to VB6 programmers.
VB.Net is NOT the successor to Visual Basic (VB6). VB.Net is a different
language. Microsoft developed a new and different language and they then
sprinkled lots of "VB sounding" constructs on top of it in a dishonest
attempt to fool people into thinking it is merely an "update" to VB6, when
in fact it is nothing of the sort. The new version of Delphi is just as much
a successor to VB6 as VB.Net is!
You've obviously been fooled, but we haven't. None of this says anything
about the actual merits of VB.Net of course. In many ways it may be better
than VB6 and in many ways it may be worse. It is just "different". If
Micro$oft had not lied to me then I might have actually bought it myself to
try it out. But I do not trust Micro$oft, because they lied to me, and so
they shall not be getting another penny of my hard earned money. And neither
shall I accept a free copy of VB.Net from simply because they have now
realised how difficult it is to sell!
Mike
Mike
Post by Tyro
There is no VB 7. Learn to live with it. VB .Net is the successor.
Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
"successor" is not the same as "comes after"
Post by Tyro
Talk to Microsoft about that. I see no VB7 on the horizon. If Microsoft
continues in the future with the .NET languages only, would you not
categorize Visual Basic .NET as the successor to Visual Basic 6?
Tyro
Post by Bob Butler
Neither do I. I'm hopeful that some vendor will eventually produce
something that fills the hole left by MS abandoning VB.
No more than C# or any other dotnet language could be called that.
Successor implies continuity and there is none.
Post by Tyro
Ah well, this is the way it is.
Tyro
Post by Mike Williams
I already KNOW there is no VB7. And yes, I have already learned to live with
it.
No it's not. VB.Net is a new and completely different language. It is NOT
the successor to anything. If I want to choose a successor to VB6 then I
will chose it myself from one of the many different RAD tools that are
available. It may be VB.Net, but it is far more likely not to be because I
do not trust Micro$oft, so I will probably choose a RAD tool produced by
someone else.
Mike
Post by Mike Williams
No. Certainly not. Why should I? It is NOT the successor to VB6. It is a
different product that just happens to be made by the same manufacturer. If
H.J. Heinz stop making baked beans in tomato sauce (a great favourite over
here in the UK) and if they instead produce fried beans in pig's liver and
onion gravy I definitely would NOT see the fried beans as being the
successor to the baked beans, no matter what H.J. Heinz tried to tell me,
and I would not buy them! I would go somewhere else and I would buy my baked
beans from them instead! And if nobody else produced anything similar to the
baked beans in tomato sauce that I was used to then I would look at all the
available alternatives from all manufacturers and I would choose something
that I liked, and it would almost certainly not be the fried beans in pig's
liver and onion gravy! Sheesh! How can you be so totally taken in by
Micro$haft! Have you no mind of your own?
Mike
Post by Mike Williams
That's a totally meaningless statement! What do you mean by "this". Exactly
what is "the way it is"? Talk sense man! Speak English!
Mike
Post by Jhessa Reid
Hi there,
Regarding about this [B][URL=http://www.speedypc.net/articles/runtime_error429.aspx]Runtime Error 429[/URL][/B], it often occurs when your computer is housing damaged or fragmented files. These often occur if your computer has a virus or if you failed to install or uninstall a program or application properly. Regardless of the cause, computer errors can be incredibly frustrating. They slow you down and can cause your computer to crash and lose valuable information. If you encounter runtime errors you should probably clean your Windows Database, which stores a vast amount of data about your hardware, software, user profiles and settings.
GODSPEED..:)
Post by Jhessa Reid
Hi there,
Regarding about this <a href="http://www.speedypc.net">Speed Up Computer</a>
, it often occurs when your computer is housing damaged or fragmented files. These often occur if your computer has a virus or if you failed to install or uninstall a program or application properly. Regardless of the cause, computer errors can be incredibly frustrating. They slow you down and can cause your computer to crash and lose valuable information. If you encounter runtime errors you should probably clean your Windows Database, which stores a vast amount of data about your hardware, software, user profiles and settings.
GODSPEED..:)
Post by Jhessa Reid
Hi there,
Regarding about this Runtime Error 429, it often occurs when your computer is housing damaged or fragmented files. These often occur if your computer has a virus or if you failed to install or uninstall a program or application properly. Regardless of the cause, computer errors can be incredibly frustrating. They slow you down and can cause your computer to crash and lose valuable information. If you encounter runtime errors you should probably clean your Windows Database, which stores a vast amount of data about your hardware, software, user profiles and settings.
http://www.speedypc.net/articles/runtime_error429.aspx
GODSPEED..:)
Submitted via EggHeadCafe - Software Developer Portal of Choice
FireAndForget Asynchronous Utility Class for SQL Server Inserts and Updates
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/tutorials/aspnet/7a22d9a4-59fc-40b0-8337-75c76f14fb3b/fireandforget-asynchronous-utility-class-for-sql-server-inserts-and-updates.aspx
Mike Williams
2008-03-11 13:49:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tyro
Talk to Microsoft about that. I see no VB7 on the horizon.
If Microsoft continues in the future with the .NET languages
only, would you not categorize Visual Basic .NET as the
successor to Visual Basic 6?
No. Certainly not. Why should I? It is NOT the successor to VB6. It is a
different product that just happens to be made by the same manufacturer. If
H.J. Heinz stop making baked beans in tomato sauce (a great favourite over
here in the UK) and if they instead produce fried beans in pig's liver and
onion gravy I definitely would NOT see the fried beans as being the
successor to the baked beans, no matter what H.J. Heinz tried to tell me,
and I would not buy them! I would go somewhere else and I would buy my baked
beans from them instead! And if nobody else produced anything similar to the
baked beans in tomato sauce that I was used to then I would look at all the
available alternatives from all manufacturers and I would choose something
that I liked, and it would almost certainly not be the fried beans in pig's
liver and onion gravy! Sheesh! How can you be so totally taken in by
Micro$haft! Have you no mind of your own?

Mike
Mike Williams
2008-03-11 13:37:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tyro
There is no VB 7. Learn to live with it.
I already KNOW there is no VB7. And yes, I have already learned to live with
it.
Post by Tyro
VB .Net is the successor.
No it's not. VB.Net is a new and completely different language. It is NOT
the successor to anything. If I want to choose a successor to VB6 then I
will chose it myself from one of the many different RAD tools that are
available. It may be VB.Net, but it is far more likely not to be because I
do not trust Micro$oft, so I will probably choose a RAD tool produced by
someone else.

Mike
Loading...